COPS FORCE CHRISTIANS REENACTING CRUCIFIX TO LEAVE PARK, VIOLATED 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, CHRISTIANS DO NOT LOSE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS WHILE ON GOVERNMENT LANDS, THIS IS RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION AND INTOLERANCE!

COPS FORCE CHRISTIANS REENACTING CRUCIFIX TO LEAVE PARK, VIOLATED 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, CHRISTIANS DO NOT LOSE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS WHILE ON GOVERNMENT LANDS, THIS IS RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION AND INTOLERANCE!

CHRISTIANS DO NOT LOSE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS WHILE ON GOVT. LANDS:
Religious discrimination has to be combated with lawsuits. They need to go to the ACLJ, Jay Sekulow or The Liberty Counsel and take this to court. The 1964 Civil Rights Act protects Christians as a protected class, they do not lose their civil rights on government lands. THERE IS NO FREEDOM FROM RELIGION, THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT DID NOT FIND A FREEDOM FROM RELIGION, RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE IS EXPECTED!

Carrie Geren Scoggins 

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/04/19/what-cops-ordered-organizers-of-a-crucifixion-display-to-do-has-some-angry-its-ridiculous/

What Cops Ordered Organizers of a Crucifixion Display to do Has Some Angry: ‘It’s Ridiculous’

www.theblaze.com

A crucifixion display drew controversy in southwest Florida Friday, with deputies ultimately responding to the scene and putting an end to the graphic presentation. The display, which depicted a bloody Jesus with fake wounds tied to a cross, was erected on the side of a road...

CHRISTIAN BIBLE STUDY GROUP WINS LAWSUIT AGAINST THE STATE/PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN NY! CHRISTIAN STUDENT'S CIVIL RIGHTS WINS OUT!

AFTER SCHOOL BIBLE CLUB CASE, BIBLE CLUB WINS THE CASE! CHRISTIAN STUDENT'S CIVIL RIGHTS ARE UPHELD!
THE STUDENTS DO NOT LOSE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS WHILE ON GOVERNMENT LANDS! 
1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, AND FEDERAL SUPREME COURT RULINGS SUPPORTING THE STUDENTS LEGAL FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, AND STUDENT LEAD PRAYER.

CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS POLITICAL NEWSLETTER BIBLE PROPHECY TIMES EDITION 


https://apps.facebook.com/aclj-social/school-prayer/victory-for-bible-club-in-ny?sf25131357=1

Victory for a Bible Club

apps.facebook.com

This week the ACLJ aided a New York high school student start up an after-school, student-led Bible study club.

END TIMES EVENTS, VIDEO LINKS, NEWS FOOTAGE, DOCUMENTED EVENTS, CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS BIBLE PROPHECY CHANNEL

END TIMES EVENTS, VIDEO LINKS, NEWS FOOTAGE, DOCUMENTED EVENTS, CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS BIBLE PROPHECY CHANNEL

BIBLE PROPHECY CHANNEL, END TIMES EVENTS, 
CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS POLITICAL NEWSLETTER
http://bibleprophecychannelendtimeevents.blogspot.com

DOCUMENTED END TIMES EVENTS COMING TO PASS,
VIDEO LINKS, NEWS FOOTAGE, TO END TIMES EVENTS!
CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS

THE ATTEMPT TO BAN "SEXUAL ORIENTATION CHANGE," FAILED, IT WOULD VIOLATE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, STATE CAN NOT BAN BIBLE TEACHINGS ON BEING SET FREE, RELIGIOUS TENETS OF FAITH PROTECTED BY FIRST AMENDMENT!

THE ATTEMPT TO BAN "SEXUAL ORIENTATION CHANGE," FAILED, IT WOULD VIOLATE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, STATE CAN NOT BAN BIBLE TEACHINGS ON BEING SET FREE, RELIGIOUS TENETS OF FAITH PROTECTED BY FIRST AMENDMENT! 

DELIVERANCE MINISTRIES CAN NOT BE BANNED, IT WOULD VIOLATE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, IMPEDING THE FREEDOM OF THE RELIGIOUS TENETS OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH, THAT OF "DELIVERANCE," AND ROMANS CHAP 1, THE ATTEMPT TO BAN "SEXUAL ORIENTATION CHANGE," FAILED, IT WOULD VIOLATE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE:

HB 5569 was sponsored by Rep. Kelly Cassidy (D-Chicago), 

the Youth Mental Health Protection Act would have been overturned by the Federal Supreme Court for religious censorship and infringing upon the deliverance ministries legal rights.

It is Christians "legal right to debate the issue," as upheld when Federal Supreme Court overturned the hate speech laws, meaning Christians can legally debate the homosexual lifestyle in all aspects, including deliverance from it. No religious tenet can be censored, and not Romans chap 1, nor the deliverance ministries teachings. The Federal Supreme Court upheld our "legal right to adhere to core values," stated specifically Romans chapter one, and all other religious tenets of faith. 

The 1964 Civil Rights Act gave Christians protected class status, their faith is a protected class. They can not be discriminated against by calling their faith tenets as "hate," and since the Federal Supreme Court did NOT find a freedom from religion, religious tolerance is expected for the Christian religious tenets of faith, that of Romans chap 1, and "deliverance," ministries teachings on being "set free."

Carrie Geren Scoggins Political Newsletter Bible Prophecy Times Edition Facebook

Carrie Geren Scoggins 



http://christiannews.net/2014/04/14/illinois-house-rejects-bill-banning-help-for-homosexual-youth/#comment-39582

Illinois House Rejects Bill Banning Help for Homosexual Youth

christiannews.net

SPRINGFIELD -- The Illinois House of Representatives has rejected a bill would have banned 'sexual orientation change efforts' for homosexual youth. HB 5569 was ...

BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY DISCRIMINATES AGAINST FEMINIST- THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE THE ISSUES/ THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE ISLAM, "ILL SUE, ON A LEGAL NOTE, BY CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS," ADDED TO YOUTUBE PLAYLIST "CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS POLITICAL NEWSLETTER BIBLE PROPHECY TIMES EDITION UPDATES

http://youtu.be/jRATktKyT50

BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY WITHDRAWS HONORARY DEGREE FROM WOMEN'S RIGHTS ACTIVIST AYAAN HIRSI ALI CITING HER OPEN REBUKE OF ISLAM FOR VIOLATIONS OF WOMEN'S RIGHT AS VIOLATING THEIR CORE VALUES.

A UNIVERSITY RECEIVING STATE FUNDS CAN NOT CLAIM "CORE VALUES," A RELIGIOUS LEGAL CLAIM, AS IT WOULD ESTABLISH THE UNIVERSITY AS ADHERING TO THAT RELIGIOUS DOCTRINE, WHICH WOULD VIOLATE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, 

STATE ENDORSEMENT OF THAT RELIGION, IN THIS CASE THAT OF ISLAM. THIS UNIVERSITY CAN NOT IMPEDE ONE'S "LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE THE ISSUE," AS UPHELD BY THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT WHEN OVERTURNING THE HATE SPEECH LAWS. THE LEGAL RIGHT OF RELIGIOUS DEBATE ON ANY TOPIC.



BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY WITHDRAWS HONORARY DEGREE FROM WOMEN'S RIGHTS ACTIVIST AYAAN HIRSI ALI CITING HER OPEN REBUKE OF ISLAM FOR VIOLATIONS OF WOMEN'S RIGHT AS VIOLATING THEIR CORE VALUES.

AYAAN HIRSI ALI WAS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST, 

DUE TO THE RELIGIOUS BIAS AGAINST HER VIEWPOINTS ON ISLAMIC COUNTRIES PRACTICE OF FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION, FORCED CHILD "MARRIAGES," 

AND  OTHER ACTS OF CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AGAINST WOMEN IN ISLAMIC COMMUNITIES.   



THE UNIVERSITY CLAIMS THAT AYAAN HIRSI ALI'S EXPOSING OF ISLAMIC PRACTICES VIOLATING WOMEN'S RIGHTS VIOLATED THEIR "CORE VALUES." 

NO STATE ENTITY CAN CLAIM "CORE VALUES," AS IT IS A RELIGIOUS RULING, THE LEGAL RIGHT TO "ADHERE TO CORE VALUES," 

HOWEVER, NO STATE ENTITY, NOR ANY ENTITY TAKING STATE FUNDS, COULD CLAIM RELIGIOUS CORE VALUES, WITHOUT IT BEING STATE ENDORSEMENT OF THE SPECIFIC RELIGIOUS CORE VALUES PERTAINING TO THAT TENET THEY ARE CLAIMING, WHICH VIOLATES SEP OF CHURCH AND STATE. 



BY THE UNIVERSITY CLAIMING THAT SPEAKING AGAINST ISLAMIC BELIEFS VIOLATES THEIR "CORE VALUES," THEN THEY ARE IDENTIFYING THEIR UNIVERSITY AS ADHERING TO ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS TENETS.  THIS IS STATE ENDORSEMENT OF ISLAM, STATE ENDORSEMENT OF RELIGION, VIOLATING SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, FOR ANY UNIVERSITY THAT ACCEPTS STATE FUNDS. 



SINCE THE "HATE SPEECH," LAWS WERE OVERTURNED IN THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT, UPHOLDING ONE'S "LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUE," GIVING AYAAN HIRSI ALI THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE ISLAM, OR DEBATE ANY TOPIC FROM ANY VIEWPOINT, WITHOUT CENSORSHIP.  

THE HATE SPEECH LAWS WERE DEEMED UNCONSTITUTIONAL CENSORSHIP THAT VIOLATED THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH. IT IS THE LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUES. 



GOVERNMENT ENTITIES, OR THOSE TAKING GOVERNMENT FUNDS, ARE EXPECTED TO ADHERE TO THIS FEDERAL SUPREME COURT RULING, WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT CHRISTIANS HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE ANY ISSUE FROM THEIR VIEWPOINTS, BE IT THAT OF HOMOSEXUALITY, OR RELIGIOUS DEBATE OF OTHER RELIGIONS SUCH AS ISLAM. 



OUR U.S. LAWS ARE NOT THAT OF THE E.U., NOR THE U.N., WHICH CENSOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH THROUGH HATE SPEECH LAWS, AND ANTI-BLASPHEMING LAWS, MAKING IT ILLEGAL TO FREELY DEBATE ISLAM. THE U.N. ANTI-BLASPHEMING LAWS MAKES SPEAKING AGAINST MUHAMMAD, ISLAM, OR THE KORAN, ILLEGAL. 

THIS VIOLATES OUR LAWS IN THE US OF OUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH, WHICH HAS BEEN UPHELD IN OUR FEDERAL SUPREME COURT GIVING US THE "LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUE," INCLUDING THAT OF ISLAM. 



THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE ANY ISSUE, FROM ANY PERSPECTIVE, STRAIGHT ACROSS THE BOARD FROM ANY END OF THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM, OR RELIGIOUS SPECTRUM, OR ANY SCHOOL OF THOUGHT.

DEMOCRAT LIBERALS WANT TO CENSOR THE VIEWPOINTS OPPOSING THEIRS, WHICH IS MARXISM, OR "WORKING FOR THE COLLECTIVE GOOD," WHERE A GOVERNMENT BUREAU DECIDES WHAT WE CAN, OR CAN NOT, SAY, 

DUE TO WHAT THEY DEEM TO BE THE COLLECTIVE GOOD. THIS IS THE OPPOSITE OF THOMAS JEFFERSON OF WHOM SUPPORTED THE RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL, WHERE WE DECIDE WHAT IS GOOD FOR US, AND NOT THE STATE, 

AND THE RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL SUPERCEDE THAT OF THE COLLECTIVE GOOD, SO THAT WE DO NOT SUFFER TYRANNY, NOR CENSORSHIP. 



IN THE UNITED STATES OUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS PREVENT CENSORSHIP OF VIEWPOINTS WHICH SOME DEEM OFFENSIVE. IT IS THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE ANY ISSUE, ARGUE, DISAGREE, OR BE OFFENSIVE TO OTHERS. 

THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH CAN BE AN OFFENSIVE THING, BUT TOLERANCE OF OTHER PEOPLE VOICING THEIR VIEWPOINTS IS EXPECTED. TOLERANCE FOR THOSE DEBATING ISSUES FROM THEIR CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS VIEWPOINTS IS ALSO EXPECTED, CHRISTIANS, AND WOMEN'S RIGHTS ACTIVISTS, HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE ISLAM. 



YOU ARE NOT A LIBERTARIAN UNTIL YOU SUPPORT THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF THOSE THAT YOU DESPISE!

MOZILLA VIOLATES RELIGIOUS LIBERTIES, 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, CORE VALUES, CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS. "I'LL SUE, ON A LEGAL NOTE, BY CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS," ADDED TO YOUTUBE PLAYLIST "CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS POLITICAL NEWSLETTER BIBLE PROPHECY TIMES EDITION UPDATES"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBSqi1sKObE&index=2&list=PLRxsMy-rzJoXdQpluYCJGjTjIIHcmEymy



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBSqi1sKObE&list=PLRxsMy-rzJoXdQpluYCJGjTjIIHcmEymy&feature=share





CEO OF MOZILLA BULLIED INTO RESIGNING AFTER HE DONATED TO AN ORGANIZATION SUPPORTING THE CHRISTIAN DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE:   



MOZILLA VIOLATES 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, AND FEDERAL SUPREME COURT RULING GIVING CHRISTIANS THE "LEGAL RIGHTS TO ADHERE TO CORE VALUES," CHRISTIANS DO NOT LOOSE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS WHILE ON THE JOB





BRENDAN EICH DONATED $1,000 DOLLARS TO A GROUP SUPPORTING THE BIBLICAL DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE, WHICH IS ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN, OPPOSING PROPOSITION 8. THEN HE SUFFERED DISCRIMINATION WHEN THE COMPANY SENT OUT MESSAGES DEMONIZING HIM FOR HIS BELIEF IN ROMANS CHAP. 1, BULLYING HIM INTO RESIGNING.





THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT MAINTAINS THAT ONE DOES NOT LOSE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS WHEN THEY GO ONTO THEIR JOBS, NOR IN THEIR BUSINESSES, AND THE FED SUPREME COURT RULINGS OF OUR "LEGAL RIGHTS TO ADHERE TO CORE VALUES."  





MOZILLA IS VIOLATED THEIR CEO'S CHRISTIAN CIVIL RIGHTS DEMONIZING THEIR EMPLOYEE FOR HIS CHRISTIAN TENETS OF FAITH, THAT OF ROMANS CHAP 1., AND THE DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE BEING BETWEEN ONE MAN, AND ONE WOMAN. THE CEO HAS A LEGAL RIGHT TO "ADHERE TO CORE VALUES," AND IS SUPPORTED BY THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 



[ violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 ]







THE MESSAGE SENT OUT BY THE COMPANY THAT THE CEO BRENDAN EICH WORKED FOR ATTEMPTED TO DEMONIZE HIS RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AS ANTI-GAY, FOR HIS BELIEFS IN THE BIBLE'S VIEWPOINT OF HOMOSEXUAILTY BEING SIN, AND HIS SUPPORT OF THE BIBLICAL DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE BEING LAW. THIS VIOLATES EICH'S CHRISTIAN CIVIL RIGHTS, AS HIS EMPLOYER CAN NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST HIS TENET OF FAITH, THAT OF ROMANS CHAP 1., OR ANY BIBLICAL BELIEFS. 





CHRISTIANS DO NOT LOSE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS, THEIR LEGAL RIGHT TO "ADHERE TO CORE VALUES," SUCH AS ROMANS CHAPTER 1, OR ANY BIBLICAL BELIEF, WHILE ON THE JOB, OR IN THEIR BUSINESSES.  THIS FEDERAL SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT HAS BEEN SET, SUPPORTING CHRISTIAN CIVIL RIGHTS.  THE "CORE VALUES" RULING SUPPORTED THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 



[Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 ]





THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT OVERTURNED THE "HATE SPEECH," LAWS THAT CENSORED BIBLICAL SCRIPTURES ON HOMOSEXAULITY, AND UPHELD THE CHRISTIAN'S "LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUE," 



SUPPORTING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS OF CHRISTIANS, 



AND THEIR LEGAL RIGHTS TO ADHERE TO CORE VALUES OF ROMANS CHAP.1, AS THE HATE SPEECH LAWS VIOLATED SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE IN ILLEGAL RELIGIOUS CENSORSHIP.  WE DO NOT PREACH A CENSORED BIBLE, AND HAVE THE FULL LEGAL RIGHT TO PREACH, TEACH, ADHERE TO, AND SUPPORT, THE CHRISTIAN VIEWPOINTS.





DEMOCRATS ONLY WANTED FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS FOR THOSE SUPPORTING THEIR VIEWS, BUT OUR LAWS SUPPORT THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF THOSE FROM BOTH ENDS OF THE POLITICAL, AND RELIGIOUS, SPECTRUMS, WITHOUT CENSORSHIP!  



IT IS FREEDOM STRAIGHT ACROSS THE BOARD, INCLUDING THE FREEDOM FOR CHRISTIANS.  IT IS THE LEGAL RIGHTS TO OPPOSE MAINSTREAM THOUGHT.THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DISAGREE, ARGUE, AND DEBATE, ISSUES, AND TO ADHERE TO BIBLICAL MORAL STANDARDS. 





ONE'S EMPLOYER CAN NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ONE'S RELIGIOUS TENETS OF FAITH. THEY CAN NOT HARASS THEIR EMPLOYEES OVER THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON ANY ISSUE, NOR DEMONIZE THEM TO OTHERS FOR SAID BELIEFS.  THIS INCLUDES ROMANS CHAP. 1, WHICH REFERS TO HOMOSEXUALITY AS A SINFUL LIFESTYLE, THAT OF A REPROBATE MIND.  RELIGION IS A "PROTECTED CLASS" UNDER THE LAW, AND IT IS ILLEGAL TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST EMPLOYEES DUE TO RELIGIOUS FAITH. 





EVEN IF OTHERS FIND THE EMPLOYEE'S CHRISTIAN FAITH OFFENSIVE, THEY CAN NOT CENSOR THE EMPLOYEE ON RELIGIOUS ISSUES, NOR CAN DISCRIMINATE. 



THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT DID ***NOT*** FIND A FREEDOM FROM RELIGION, SO THOSE THAT OPPOSE THE CHRISTIAN FAITH ARE EXPECTED TO PRACTICE RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE. 



MOZILLA WAS EXPECTED TO BE TOLERANT OF THE RELIGIOUS CONVICTIONS OF THEIR CEO, MR. EICH. 









THERE IS NO FREEDOM FROM RELIGION, OUR FEDERAL SUPREME COURT DID NOT FIND A FREEDOM FROM RELIGION. RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE IS EXPECTED FROM THOSE THAT OPPOSE THE CHRISTIAN VIEWS~





"YOU ARE NOT A LIBERTARIAN UNTIL YOU SUPPORT THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF THOSE THAT YOU DESPISE." 







CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS YOUTUBE CHANNEL PLAYLISTS AND VIDEOS COVER TOPICS RANGING FROM: 



Playlists And Videos Of Christian Bible Children's Videos, Cartoons / Claymation / Puppet videos,  Christian guitar, Christian Band, Christian Music, Latin and Spanish Guitar, Christian Band Rejoice, Playlists of Bible Prophecy, End Time Events, Natural Disasters Book Of Revelations, Water Turned To Blood Rev 16:4, Political, Bible Videos, Favorites,  Playlists With Clean Movies, Documentaries, How To Videos.prophecy

MOZILLA VIOLATES 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, AND FEDERAL SUPREME COURT RULING GIVING CHRISTIANS THE "LEGAL RIGHTS TO ADHERE TO CORE VALUES," CHRISTIANS DO NOT LOOSE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS WHILE ON THE JOB

MOZILLA VIOLATES 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, AND FEDERAL SUPREME COURT RULING GIVING CHRISTIANS THE "LEGAL RIGHTS TO ADHERE TO CORE VALUES," CHRISTIANS DO NOT LOOSE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS WHILE ON THE JOB:
HOPE MOZILLA IS SUED!
The law states that he can not be fired for supporting his religious beliefs, "adhering to core values," Federal Supreme Court ruling that cited Christians legal rights to adhere to core values, including that of Romans chap 1, upholding the 1964 Civil Rights Act, in that Christians do not loose their civil rights when on the job, or in their own private businesses. If he files suite against Mozilla for anti Christian religious discrimination he will win, due to the laws, and court precedents supporting his legal rights. He has the legal right to not support gay marriage, to create his own groups supporting his religious beliefs, to proselytize his faith including Romans chap 1, as this is the law. These laws are the same reason A and E, of which had let Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson, go from the job, suddenly recanted, due to the threat of a civil rights lawsuit against A and E. Punitive for violating Christian civil rights is over 100 million dollars! I hope that Mozilla is sued! 


Carrie Geren Scoggins 

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/04/okcupid-ceo-donate-anti-gay-firefox

OkCupid's CEO Donated to an Anti-Gay Campaign Once, Too

www.motherjones.com

Cofounder and CEO Sam Yagan donated $500 to a notoriously anti-gay, anti-abortion candidate.